Marginal Tax Rates on Labor Income Under the Democratic House Ways and Means Child Tax Credit Proposal

Federal Tax

The coronavirus relief legislation passed out of the House Ways and Means Committee last week would significantly expand the child tax credit (CTC) for 2021, from its current $2,000 maximum to a fully refundable $3,600 for children 6 and under and $3,000 for children over 6. Monthly payments would be provided based on income tax returns on file with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for 2019 or 2020.

The changes would increase the benefits that lower-income households receive by making the CTC fully refundable and eliminating the phase-in with earned income. While overall benefits would increase, eliminating the phase-in would also affect marginal tax rates. Marginal tax rates on labor income measure the effective tax rate that applies to earning one more dollar of income and can differ from statutory individual income tax rates due to phase-ins and phaseouts of various tax provisions as well as payroll taxes and other taxes on income.

Examining marginal tax rates can help show the incentives that workers face and how policies influence labor supply. We can see how the tax code would treat an additional dollar of income earned under the expanded child tax credit compared to current law.

Take, for example, a household with married taxpayers filing jointly and two children under 6. Under the proposal, their maximum CTC of $4,000 under current law would rise to a maximum of $7,200 under the Democratic proposal. The overall benefit would significantly increase. But under the proposal, households would see an increase in marginal tax rates because the CTC no longer phases in and because of the phaseout of the larger CTC benefit.

Under current law, the credit phases in with earned income above $2,500 at a 15 percent rate, which reduces marginal tax rates by 15 percentage points over the phase-in range. Because the newly proposed credit provides the full amount immediately to households, it no longer has a phase-in and therefore no longer reduces marginal tax rates for lower-income households (see Figure 1). The result is higher marginal tax rates over the current law phase-in range.

The Democratic proposal would also increase marginal tax rates for households at higher income levels by phasing out the extra benefit that the proposal provides over current law. The extra credit provided under the proposal (in the current example, an extra $3,200 above the current law amount of $4,000) would begin phasing out at $150,000 in income at a 5 percent rate until it reaches the amount that would be provided under current law, to preserve existing CTC benefits. The phaseout of the extra amount increases marginal tax rates by 5 percentage points compared to current law (see Figure 1).

Democrats House Ways and Means covid proposal would increase marignal tax rates while receiving larger child tax credit benefits. Democrats child tax credit plan

Marginal tax rates would change in a similar way for other filers. For example, a single parent with one child under 6 (a head of household filer) would be eligible for a maximum $2,000 CTC under current law compared to $3,600 under the Democratic proposal. Like the previous example, marginal tax rates would be higher because the CTC no longer phases in and because of the phaseout of the additional CTC benefit.

Democratic House Ways and Means covid proposal would increase marginal tax rates for some head of household filers. Democrats child tax credit plan

The proposed expansion of credits is only for 2021 and would not be a permanent policy change. Other proposals, like Senator Mitt Romney’s (R-UT) Family Security Act, would permanently expand the child tax credit. It is likely that any temporary expansion would create pressure for an extension or permanence, however. Some argue that the increases in marginal tax rates created by removing the phase-ins would reduce work incentives and potentially negate the positive effects of larger benefits; but the magnitude of the effect is debated. Comparing both the total amount of benefits and the changes in marginal tax rates under each proposal can inform policymakers of potential trade-offs as they work to reform child- and work-related benefits.

ReportDownload Data

Was this page helpful to you?

Thank You!

The Tax Foundation works hard to provide insightful tax policy analysis. Our work depends on support from members of the public like you. Would you consider contributing to our work?

Contribute to the Tax Foundation


Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Brits to Prepare for Tax Reforms
The price of gas is climbing higher. Here’s how you can save at the pump
Insights into the Tax Systems of Scandinavian Countries
Wall Street clearing firm proposes 1-day trade settlement after Robinhood controversy
How $1,400 stimulus checks could be best targeted based on past payments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *